My pet insurance went from $39.90 to $50.51 in two years. I barely, if ever, go to the vet. I usually take my cat for her annual check-up. That is a 27% increase in two years. What is their solution, reduce your coverage!! I don't think so. Bye SPOT

Premium doubles in one year knowing other companies won’t cover preexisting conditions. It’s a trap So I contacted Fetch again following their response. My premium went from $309 to $680 per year. I requested a quote if I lowered cap from 15k to 10k. No change in premium. They say if you have a small breed dog that develops allergies, by age 4 their premiums could double.

Signed up for Pet Insurance through my Employer. I choose Accident and Illnes Insurance. My dog had a anal glanz infection and later Breast cancer for a total of like $800 dollars. After months of delaying tactics and constantly asking for medical records even when i gave the the Animal Hospital address and detailed bill they finally denied the claim saying the Anal glanz is an exception to there policy and the breast cancer must have been there before i got thew insurance. I involved HR Department from my company and there have been several incidents with delaying until the consumer gives up bothering. This insurance is not worth the time and or money. Bad Insurance.

My 5 year old staffy was dying of lymphoma, I put in a claim for all the test he needed, it took them a month to stop asking me for the same documents over and over, then my dog died, they denied my claim saying i didnt have that coverage, when I promise you, I did have it

Reps of this company (Fetch Inc / Fetch Pet Insurance) were on premises at an animal shelter and people adopting an animals (including me) were required to speak with a Fetch rep about pet health insurance prior to completing the adoption process (making payment for the animal). The Fetch rep verbally told me the pet health insurance policy was "no-risk because the first month would be free". Any subsequent month premiums would be a set amount which I was quoted verbally by a rep using rather high-pressure sales tactics, imo, and at a vulnerable moment when I was trying to pay attention to the newly adopted puppy I was literally holding in my arms. The policy coverages, endorsements, and policy number were not ever provided to me in writing — even tho the Fetch rep took my payment information at time of adoption. Two days later a debit amount appeared on my bank statement for more than the monthly premium amount quoted to me by the Fetch rep on adoption day (and per bank statement, Fetch also set this up as a monthly autopay — I never approved the debit amount charged nor recurring pre-authorized monthly premium payments.) I tried ro contact Fetch Inc to cancel any policy existing (after receiving a letter via USPS that implied I had a policy, but no policy number appeared on the letter nor did any contact info for Fetch Inc customer service). There are no direct ways (that I could find) on the Fetch website that allowed me to contact or to speak directly with an agent or customer service rep (calls during business hours M-F were directed to an answering service) to resolve these issues. Message I left with the answering service was never returned by anyone at Fetch Inc.. The shelter outtake process was rushed, chaotic, shoulder-to-shoulder (new owners and their pets). The shelter invoice listed 'Fetch Inc.' as a line item and $0.00 payment for that line item. I took that to mean I had declined coverage. In hindsight, a non-profit shelter partnering so closely (insurance reps on premises that are required as part of outtake process) with a for-profit insurance company seems suspect on the face of it. Of course, by then I had already selected a puppy. btw, this shelter also does not even allow potential adopters to enter the shelter prior to filling out a form — seems this hides from public view that an insurance company is on premises and is part of the outtake process required by the shelter. I will be reviewing and identifying the animal shelter in a separate review. Cannot recommend this pet insurance company.

New member, first claim, but it's been over 10 days and I have heard noting about my claim. I also have no way to upload banking info for ach transfer. We will see how this goes.

The application was terrible. Didn’t load, wouldn’t advance so I called and received excellent phone service. I’ve been with VPI for 25 years and have nothing but respect for your services and your claims app. But today was frustrating.

Increased policy by a couple thousand every year on top of the $400 deductible that doesn’t cover preventative care, dental, etc. They want over 8k this year & once a dog is 16 they have preexisting conditions other companies won’t cover - so embrace takes advantage of that.

A puppy cannot have a preexisting condition. It's a puppy. We literally got our puppy at 8 weeks old and got insurance a month later. It's a healthy little puppy. Moreover, "diarrhea" is not a preexisting condition. It's a "symptom" and it's "caused" from different conditions!! I guess "bleeding" is a preexisting condition too. The good reviews of SPOT must be fake. Sort by one star and do your research there. Every claim you have will be denied.

I am writing, yet again, to express my growing frustration and disappointment regarding a recurring issue with my monthly claims—an issue that has persisted for nearly three years without resolution. Despite providing clear, written documentation from my veterinarian—filed with my account—stating that both of my dogs require AGE every month, your team continues to process these claims incorrectly. I submit this documentation with every invoice and even highlight the AGE section to eliminate any possibility of confusion, yet the same mistake occurs month after month. This repeated failure is inexcusable. It demonstrates either a serious lack of training within your claims department or a complete breakdown in internal processes. I have been given the same tired explanations for years: new staff, understaffing, account flags being “missed,” system issues. At this point, those excuses are not only insufficient—they are insulting. Three years is more than enough time to identify the problem and implement a permanent fix. Your service is failing to meet even the most basic standards of accuracy and accountability. As a paying customer, I expect consistency, reliability, and professionalism. What I am receiving instead is systemic incompetence and indifference. Were it not for the restrictions posed by pre-existing condition exclusions, I would have moved on long ago. Sadly, I am effectively trapped in a relationship with a provider that repeatedly demonstrates it cannot meet its obligations. I am formally requesting that this issue be escalated to a senior-level decision-maker with the authority and competence to implement a systemic resolution. I should not be forced to waste my time each month correcting the same preventable error. This is wholly unacceptable and deeply disrespectful of my time, my effort, and my loyalty as a long-term customer. Furthermore, I find it entirely inappropriate to be told that I must contact your office *again* when this issue has already been flagged multiple times. If resolution is truly a priority, the responsibility should be on *you* to contact *me*—not the other way around. I expect a prompt and thorough response to this message, along with confirmation that meaningful corrective action is being taken. Enough is enough.