Has anyone ever heard of a requirement that a wood fence needs to have 5 feet of metal between the house and the fence for homeowner's insurance? State Farm is mandating that we replace 5 feet of our wood fence that is closest to the house with metal for the policy to go through.

I adopted bonded pair of kittens and got them on pet insurance with trupanion at 8 weeks. They just turned two and trupanion has increased my premiums by 70 % in those two years. I understand they don’t raise the premiums based on pets age, but at this rate I won’t be able to afford to insure them until they get old. Looking at switching to lemonade - my one kitty has two minor claims and my boy has none. I realize her two claims will be pre-existing but they aren’t chronic issues. To the cat parents with lemonade- do you like it? Are you happy? I know I risk their premiums rising as well but at least I can afford more coverage with a smaller deductible to start. Would love your thoughts I want the best for my babies!! Thank you

Hi, I would really appreciate it if you could provide some guidance. I am in the process of buying a 5 acre property with a 1980 1100sqft permanently attached mobile home. It is so obvious that the value is in the land. I never thought when making the offer that the manufactured home would become such a problem. My plan was to buy 5 acre land build a regular house on it in 1-2 years. Because of the manufactured home I am being hit with high interest rate and higher down payment. I was OK with that. But now the lender requires me to have Full Replacement Cost for the manufactured home. The lender would not accept the only and highest dwelling coverage I could find from Citizens. Citizens provided an RCE report stating brand new full reconstruction would cost $147k, but they would subtract depreciation and allow 25% higher in vaullue. So, that would be $62k + 25% = $78k and the premium is like $2300. Citizens won't go higher on the premium. The lender wants $147k coverage. I am unable to find any other insurers that would even insure the mobile home. I ordered 4-point inspection and the home passed it without any issues. Full roof replacement was just done 1 week ago as well. To me the mobile home is worth $30-40k at most, so the insurance company is right. Why would they insure it for higher anyways. I am purchasing the property as is for $330k. Putting down 25%. So, only borrowing $249k. The land itself is worth $300k+. I do not understand why the lender would not accept my $78k insurance as I cannot insure the land either. I told the lender/broker to be my guess and find an insurance company that would do what they are asking for. Even if they could, I could not even imagine what the premium would be on that case? 5k ? Who would pay to insurance for 40k Mobile home? What should I do?

Is this a good comp plan for State Farm or should I look elsewhere? Hey everyone, I’ve been with State Farm for about 3 months now and just recently had my agent finally sit down and go over my compensation plan — something he’s been promising to do since I started. Here’s what it looks like (full document attached): • Base Salary: $35,000 • Auto/Fire Base Commission: 5% • Life/Health: 20% of 12-month premium • PTO: 8 days • Penalties: $50 deduction off bonus for every incomplete HH checklist Bonus opportunities: • Issue 5 life policies → +3% increase on P&C commissions • Issue 4 health applications → $250 bonus The issue is, I was also promised the chance to join the Aspirant Program, which was a huge selling point for me — but as time passes, it’s becoming clear that he probably doesn’t have much control over that, and it feels less and less likely it’ll happen. So, I’m wondering… Is this a competitive compensation plan for someone in my position? Or should I start looking elsewhere? I’ve got a background in finance and have been putting in real effort here, but I’m starting to feel like this might not be a long-term fit. Appreciate any insight from others in the industry.

Help me understand this one. My wife was injured by my neighbor's dog, knocking her down and tearing her ACL (it wasn't aggressive, just large and friendly, freak accident.) Surgery was very expensive, went through my employer based insurance, no big deal. We start getting letters from Conduent, asking if someone else was responsible. Yes, neighbors dog and property. Gave them the insurance info, we all expected some subrogation of claim and I'd prepped my neighbors for that. Then I get another letter asking about what legal representation we retained in a suit against them. I called them and told them we haven't sued them. That we have a good relationship either our neighbors, it was a freak accident, and we aren't litigious. The woman sounded extremely skeptical and said something to the effect of "let's see how you feel about your neighbors in a few months. I'll check back in 6 months." It was the tone that really bothered me, sort of like "oh you just wait and see, you will!" Like something is coming down the pike that's really going to ruin my day and make me want to sue my neighbors. Can someone walk me through this one? Insurers work together in auto accidents without requiring litigation, I figured it would be the same thing here.

Had anyone else had a sudden very large increase on their auto insurance premium? I've had allstate for 1.5 years now, and it suddenly jumped up by over $100 a month with no changes. This seems to big a hike to just be rising insurance costs. Has anyone had a big increase as well? Or suggestions for what to do? I can never seem to get an answer from Allstate. One customer service person told me that Florida was having storms and this impacts insurance prices (I don't live in Florida). I'm thinking about just changing insurance companies :(

I am 20 years old and on my parents insurance. I got prescribed a medication under the impression that they would not be notified but my dad got a call about the prior authorization being approved and also a letter in the mail. Does anyone know how to change this/prevent this happening again in the future?

So the story goes: My friend in Texas totaled his car by hitting a mailbox. He has Gap insurance from the dealership, and auto insurance from progressive. Auto insurance agent told him they're going to pay the dealership instead of him. Can friend demand direct payment to himself, as the policyholder? Can his insurance just send the check somewhere else like that? The gap insurance should handle everything on the dealership side, so I don't know why his insurance company would be giving the dealership anything.

Here's the situation: **The unit below me reported ongoing water damage on their ceiling/wall.** The building paid a plumber to do an investigation. After many hours, they were able to determine there was water coming from my toilet. I brought in my own plumber and he figured out there was a leak inside the wall where the toilet connects to the pipe (its a wall mount toilet and the gasket wasn't forming a tight seal with the pipe). This toilet pre-dates my ownership, if that matters. I had him fix it and paid him. Obviously the apartment below has repair costs. I immediately engaged a claim with my homeowner policy provider (Travellers), sent them the plumbers reports (both mine and the building), the by-laws of the building, and put my insurance in touch with the owners of the below unit. Fast forward, after some research, **my claim person says 'I'm not liable because there was no way for me to know about the leak, so the owners of the below unit should file with their insurance'** It is true there was no visible leak or damage in my apartment. Now the unit below me sent me an estimate from their contractor and says 'As you’ll see, they have denied the claim, stating there was “no evidence of neglect” on your part. **Given the damages I sustained, I need to understand how you intend to address this situation and take responsibility for the repairs.**' It's not clear if they've filed with their insurance. The husband and wife don't always seem to be on the same page. They are claiming repairs cost $30,000! I don't know how much of this is really related to the damage, as they are also in the midst of a major reno and might be using this to pay for some of that on the sly. I don't have a relationship with them. To clarify the leak was a long slow drip, which only occurred when the toilet flushed, which is why it took so long for the building plumbers to track down. Regardless, it seems weird to me that the insurance judges I'm not liable, just because I couldn't know about the problem. Especially since the policy seems to explicitly cover damage from water seepage where the insured is unaware because its hidden in a wall (in the DOES NOT COVER section for liability it says: CONTINUOUS OR REPEATED SEEPAGE OR LEAKAGE OF WATER OR STEAM OVER A PERIOD OF TIME, WEEKS, MONTHS, OR YEARS, FROM WITHIN A PLUMBING, DRAINAGE, HEATING, AIR CONDITIONING,SYSTEM OR AUTOMATIC FIRE PROTECTIVE SPRINKLER SYSTEM OR FROM WITHIN A HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE **UNLESS SUCH SEEPAGE OR LEAKAGE OF WATER OR STEAM AND THE RESULTING DAMAGE ARE UNKNOWN TO ALL insureds AND ARE HIDDEN WITHIN THE WALLS OR CEILINGS OR BENEATH THE FLOORS OR ABOVE THE CEILINGS OF A STRUCTURE**). **Right now I'm waiting for response from my insurer and also the apartment below** (to see if they have filed with their insurer and if that insurer is in contact with mine). Up until now my interactions on this issue with the apartment below have been pretty even tempered, but their latest email feels like they are escalating and I'm concerned I might even need a lawyer (I live in NYC btw). (added highlights to help with TLDR)