I have had a commercial policy with the same carrier for 13 years under my ownership, but as far as I know my parents and grandparents have used the same carrier since the 1970s. Does this matter? Is a claim a claim and you get dropped or treated the same as anyone else that just signed on with them last year? I called my carrier and wanted to talk to my underwriter to verify my agent is actually trying to implement the changes i have asked for. In the past my last broker lied to me about putting in for higher fire coverage, and how I caught them was by calling my underwriter. This time when I called I got someone in member services but she wouldn't transfer me and was super passive aggressive, laughed at me etc. I want to actually use a company that's not hostile to me trying to verify if my agent is actually doing what they say. Long story short after what I believe is 49 years with one company I want to know if it's worth staying or if it matters?

I have a 2015 Toyota RAV4 and I still owe 12,000 on the vehicle, Just got it last year. with that being said I was in an accident on 3/6 and their insurance company wants to claim the vehicle as a total loss... my question is what if they don't give me enough to cover the loan? I am pretty stressed because the accident was not my fault at all. it is going to liberty mutual does anyone have any idea?

I’m moving to a new state and currently have renters’ insurance with State Farm. I filed a claim for a theft in my building a couple of months ago, where a large amount of my personal items were stolen from what was supposed to be a secure mailroom. Last Friday, I contacted a State Farm agent in my new state to set up a policy for my next apartment. After taking the weekend to get back to me, she said she had spoken with the underwriting department and they couldn’t write me a policy because of that claim. She specifically said I couldn’t have an active claim in the last **24–36 months**. That doesn’t make sense to me. Why would the rule be a range instead of a clear cutoff? Is this standard insurance practice, and I’m just unfamiliar with it, or did she give me incorrect info? The vague timeline feels odd, and I’m wondering if she was just making it up or if she has the information wrong. I ended up going with a different insurance company anyway, but just wondering if she was BSing

I'm probably going include an annoying amount of detail, so feel free to skip to the tl/dr. A little more than a week ago, I was struck by a car while riding my bike on a sidewalk (legal in my area). The driver was turning right and only checked to his left. I slowed and thought he saw me (FL allows DARK tint). I was wrong. He impacted my tire and my knee only stopping when I stuck his passenger window with my fist. My first words were "did you even fucking look?" at volume 24. That prompted a "calm down lady". I saw red about the same time that I noticed his EMT cadet uniform. The officer who responded didn't ticket him. But the crash report is clear that he is at fault. The officer asked if I would be willing to allow the driver to pay out of pocket if the damage was property only. I'm not a monster wanting to throw barrels into the path of this young man's life so I had the wheel repaired and ignored the minor cosmetic stuff. I texted him the $33 bill from my very reasonable bike guy. He swore he would send a check. (I do not want him having access to more information than he currently has). Well guess what? Yeah. I'm just done. I want to make a claim on the policy on the police report. But it's GEICO, which us also my own insurance policy. Will the pidling petty little claim red flag me to my own carrier? Tl/dr Emt cadet hit me with a car. Got very lucky with a tiny amount of damage. Will Geico ding me if I file a claim since he failed to self pay?

I am in a situation where I need a surgery so will 100% hit my out of pocket maximum. The max, 8K, is fortunately something we can readily afford. The only thing that scares me are all the scary stories about how they get completely screwed over for supposedly covered procedures and are in debt tens of thousands at once. What I do to prevent this possibility or are those detrimental stories are from people who do not have any coverage??? My insurance is with United.

I recently had to have an in-patient EEG. The neurologist said they'd call my insurance (Aetna) for pre-approval before moving forward with booking. I received a call saying that it was completely covered and to move forward with procedure. I check-in with no mention of payment and checked-out with no mention of payment. Cut to now about a month later and I receive a bill for $7,000. Apparently, insurance only offered partial coverage though I was told by my provider it will be completely covered. Do I have any recourse in this?

Tried adding pics but the rules won't allow me 🥲 Howdy Everyone, I'm posting on here hoping to get some help. Background: My wife and I bought this home about 3 years ago with signs of potential termite treatment( burrowed holes 1ft apart the whole house). We live in a plant hardiness zone 10a? I googled it. We didn't see it as an issue since there was no sign of existent pests or insects. The house was left abandoned for several years though with overgrown grass. The neighbors would take turns cutting the grass since it's a community and thus house was not being kept up. Anyways, we buy it and within a year, we see small ants crawling around the house. We didn't see it as a problem since there weren't that many and it's honestly quote normal to just see a couple of an wondering around. A year later, around spring season, in a couple walls from a room, we see a discharge of trash come out of the bottom from between the walls. It had dirt, dead ants and wings seems to be carpenter ants. Immediately we call a couple of exterminators and they both concluded it was carpenter ants. Ok fine, we went with orkin services which sold us a contract to treat inside and outside. A year goes by and we are still sewing these ants crawling up the house from outside and the discharge every now and then. After constant contacts with Orkin and them coming to treat them we didn't see any progress with them. We decided to not renew our contract. We called and they insisted on sending out a tech to check out the issue. The guy gave me a rundown that it is definelty a carpenter ant and that they need to treat specifically for that..which I though that's what they had been doing. Apparently he said that we had just been getting the common pest control plan. WHAT?!?! The issue is not common pest but a pest specifically!! I got mad, they tried to sell me more services and then a perimeter cleanse and what not. He kept insisiting on selling me the 10k services. Kicked him out the house respectfully and blocked their number. Present: Which leads me to now. I'm now trying to treat the ants myself and bought these terro ant bait stakes, terro liquid ant baits for indoor, and the Terro ant killer shaker bag I've had these for about 3 weeks now and the ant seem to be eating it but there are still so many ants coming into the home. I see them going into the stakes and piling it up with dirt as if they were closing these baits off. Smart Mfkrs lol Anvone have anv more ideas on what I could do? I also tried plugging up the holes but they just creat new ones lol

Just a warning to all pet parents. I got two cats from different shelters and signed them up together. One was from a partner shelter and should have been covered from day 1. The other could only start coverage after 2 weeks. Metlife continuously mixes up their names and denies claims for pre-existing conditions, even for the cat from the partner shelter. Sucks because I heard so many great things about them, but I haven't had a successful claim processed in 4 months of owning these cats. If anyone has tips on how to deal with pet insurance that would be really helpful.

I have been paying for Embrace Pet Insurance for nearly a year. I submitted a claim recently and apparently I was supposed to get my dogs an exam BEFORE the policy began. The dogs had an exam 16 days after the policy began. Now they are refusing to pay claims despite the fact that they happily took my money for the last year. These people are scammers. Beware!