Hi, I’m new to this sub. My husband got brinks security system before we got married, few months ago I was going through our monthly budgets and saw $65 for brinks subscription for the cameras barely working and not recording anything when something important happened. For example somebody broke in to my husband’s car and camera didn’t record then I called them and they asked $1500 for cancellation because it’s 5 years contract.. I hung up and was planning to take it to small claim court but some other major life events happened and I didn’t think about it until yesterday when somebody hit my husband’s car in front of our house where the camera supposed to record but it didn’t.. I’m so mad and want to get rid of entire system from our house and don’t want to have any legal attachment to them anymore. How can I do that without paying $1500? Would small claim court fix this? I’m willing spend few hundreds if needed. Location: Augusta, Georgia Thank you in advance to all of you.

Long story short, I was driving home from work in my work truck F150. I had merged lanes to the left after my lane had ended. I was completely in the new lane. Fully stopped when I was rear-ended by a car. Called the cops everyone was OK etc.. Both vehicles had a couple thousand dollars in damage. Luckily there was a witness who stopped and told the police that it looked like it was the other driver who rear-ended me. Call my Insurance tell them the story they tell me I’m at 0% fault. And then about an hour later, they call me back, saying the other driver with no insurance and no license called and filed a claim on my commercial insurance. To my insurance said I was 100% at fault. I proceeded to argue with the progressive insurance claims adjuster. He said that I was 100% at fault for changing lanes. Fast forward when I get the police report. Police report clearly states she is at fault. She rear-ended me she received multiple citations, including improper lane change no license no insurance. I sent the PDF of the police report to progressive and within minutes he called me saying I am at 0% fault. My question is, why did I have to go through all of this thinking I was at fault and worry about rates going up? already installed front back dashcam :)

Spoke with a woman who would not directly answer any of my questions. I asked how long until they cover a CURABLE pre existing condition such as a UTI for a cat which is a common thing some cats deal with and she went on and on and on about broken bones and all this other nonsense. I tried to steer her back to the original question several times and she just couldn’t stay on topic. I don’t know if she was on something or what her deal was but it was very weird. She didn’t want to give me a direct answer. I finally asked to speak with a supervisor. She put me on hold for several minutes and came back and said no one was available. Then she message the supervisor with my question, the supervisor just answered it directly. Imagine that. I asked a question and they just answered it. I told her thank you and that was the question I was trying to get an answer to. She said I should have told her that lol. I tried to explain how this can be frustrating and a little suspicious to a pet parent that’s trying to get info. I explained that it is as if she was working me a little. Like she was saying words without answering the question and talking in circles. I would ask a question and she would answer it as if I asked another question. Very sales pitchy. It was very bizarre to say the least. She then started raising her voice and talking over me so at that point I told her to have a nice day. If you are also curious, there is no amount of time after a cat gets a uti that that they will cover it. There is no curable condition time period like some companies (usually 12 months to 18 months). My cat has had one uti a year and a half ago (she is 2 years old) and if she were to get one at any point in the future it will not be covered. The woman told me not to worry about a uti and that it’s not a big deal which made me uncomfortable. I had to give her a break down of how expensive it actually is. There is the office visit, which is often a same day emergency visit which is more expensive because a uti can come on quickly, the urinalysis, and the medications. It’s expensive. Hundreds of dollars. She then asked why I’m so concerned about a uti, maybe my cat has kidney disease or something. I said no, she does not, I would just like to know what I am paying for coverage wise, what is covered, and what to expect. She then began her sales pitch again and didn’t respond to what I said. She was off on another roll. Very unproductive and unprofessional conversation to say the least. When companies act like this and you get that pit in your stomach, it is bad deal and you need to get off it. There was nothing good about whatever that was. Really scary these people are in charge of providing insurance for beloved pets.

Is it even legal for Healthy Paws pet insurance to increase premiums at almost 200% in CA? This is outrageously high!! Anyone experiencing the same? #healthypawspetinsurance

I go through the prompts, I get connected to someone, and I just hear a conversation between two people talking about random things that I can barely make out. They don’t respond to me so I hang up and try again, same thing. What is actually going on? Do customer service reps just answer and then ignore people so they’ll hang up?

So the title basically sums it up. I had I guy scrape the paint off the driver side front fender and a little bit off the side around the wheel well at a gas station about 4:30 am after I got off work. I got their insurance info and pictures of the damage, ID, and insurance info (Progressive). Someone gave me their number to act as a witness and it's on the video at the gas station, and the gas station employees know me from stopping by after work and said they'd act as witness too, so I didn't think it was worth calling the cops over. The problem is, is that Progressive wanted me to use their website/app to take pictures of the car and then a video of the car (inside too for some reason). Honestly it seemed like a bit of a hassle. Any other time I've had something like that happen I've just had to take it to a shop and it gets fixed. The car was in perfect condition went it happened, which they asked about when I was filling the initial claim. Unfortunately I put it off for a a couple weeks since my working nights made it so it was dark when I got home and the sun was going down when I got up to leave for work (this was about a month ago when we had less daylight), and off course I procrastinated like I shouldn't have since the car was fine to drive. Then, about 2 weeks later, I was driving home after work and was in this stretch of the highway that is really dark when something hit my car HARD. I didn't know what it was, it was just some black blur that I didn't have enough time to dodge. I pulled over really quick cause I was dragging something and I didn't know what condition my car was in. Turns out I was dragging a chunk of my fender that was broken off. Luckily my car was drivable, but I had a hole about a foot in diameter taken out of the front fender closer to the passenger side of the car. I walked back up the highway and it turns out the semi I was behind shredded a tire and it just ripped threw my car. I've seen people hit by those before and it's surprising how much damage they can do. I honestly thought I'd have more damage from the sound of it and from the feel of the impact. Now my problem is both that I didn't get the semi truck's info so I can't have them pay for that damage, and because it happened before I made the video I now have damage to the same piece of the car that was mainly damaged by the the guy at the gas station. So I've just been stressing out about how to deal with it, not knowing how I should go about handling this now that it's gotten complicated. I swear, I go years without trouble then get hit back to back. So when looking online to help figure out what to do, I found some similar stories on Reddit while trying to navigate this, but none that fit me specifically. So I'm hoping I could get some advice on how to best deal with this, or at least someone that can let me know what to expect. Sorry for the length of post, and I appreciate any help!

Nationwide tripled policy and cut coverage 40% Last year they tripled my policy to over $3k, and just sent me a letter saying next year they are cutting coverage to 50%. Been with them for probably 5+ years. I am on a grandfathered plan that covered 90% and wellness, so basically everything (including food since prescribed). To pay triple the rate and then also lose 40% of my coverage is absurd, and they said they have no other options or plans to reduce costs. Monthly costs also only drop $30 which is a slap in the face. Any idea where I can go or what I can do to control costs? He’s a 12.5 year old “beagle” mix for reference and has cushings for background.

26, California, $37,000. My health insurance provider denied me access to estradiol for the purpose of gender transition (MtF). I was prescribed this by my doctor and they called me to inform me that my insurance excludes anything under gender related health care according to a denial letter they got from the company. Blue Cross Blue Shield Kansas City provides the health care in Missouri because of the company being nationwide, although I am based in California. I have yet to receive a copy of the denial letter myself, but plan to get a copy of the one from my doctor's office if I don't receive one in the mail this following week from the company. According to the BCBSKS website they do cover gender transition and when I started this job I asked them if it was covered. My H.R. representative seemed confused about the denial and said she'd look into it as she'd never run into this before. She also that they supposedly cover gender related surgery at a certain percentage so something seems fishy. Is this a recent policy change? What are my options? I'm currently filing a complaint through my recently formed union at the company and will be using GoodRx to be able to afford it, but now I'm worried if I tried to receive anything else transition related and am frustrated it won't go towards a deductible. I don't have the letter of denial yet. Will I be able to appeal with information on the letter? Is this legal since I am a California resident or is it all purely through Missouri laws? Just looking for advice.

Last night I received a cancellation notice from progressive for “debris and hazards needing removal” and they said I needed a complete roof replacement. My roof is 13 years old but is in really good condition. No branches or leaves on it. No missing shingles. No hail damage or peeling. They didn’t even give me a chance to rectify the situation before sending me a refund check. The inspection report is bogus. The guy took the pics from the ground. I’m shopping around now but scared to get another denial by another inspector. I have high credit and pay everything on time. I have only ever had one claim and it was in 2024 and the adjuster said there was minor wind damage and we just needed to replace a few shingles which we did.

I have a health plan with Aetna, and for specialist office visits, the copay is $65. For outpatient diagnostic testing, there is no charge, no copay, and no deductible applied. I went to my specialist's office for a blood test with a nurse, without seeing the doctor. A few weeks later, I received a bill from the doctor's office showing that I owe $65. I called my doctor's office, and the finance department said they billed using CPT code 36415, which is correct. Then I called Aetna, and a representative said, "Because the lab is an in-house lab at my specialist's office, if I go to a doctor's office for outpatient diagnostic testing, the $65 copay applies since I received a service from the provider." Is this correct? I had blood work done at other specialists' offices last year without seeing the doctor, and I wasn't charged the $65 copay. Did Aetna change their terms this year? Has anyone had a similar experience? Is it normal for Aetna to categorize diagnostic testing done in a specialist's office as a doctor's visit?