Embrace Pet Insurance - Took the insurance for a test drive for…
Took the insurance for a test drive with my claim.
Embrace Pet Insurance - I canceld my policy because of this.
I guess this leading statement in the comments box, "What went wrong this time?", explains their work. My dog is experiencing something to cause him to vomit and I've had numerous tests done on him to see what might be the cause. Because a vet visit 11 & 1/2 months ago mentioned vomiting, Embrace stated this is a preexisting condition. Vomiting? Really? Who has a dog who didn't. My case is extreme this time, but Embrace refused to reimburse me a dime on anything. They said he would be covered for vomiting in the future if he has no further case of it for 12 months. I guess I missed the window of opportunity by half a month.
Embrace Pet Insurance - For some reason my email is now not…
For some reason my email is now not associated with an account after I paid 469$ for an annual membership. Now have to go through the hassle of figuring out how to fix it so i can even put in a claim.
Embrace Pet Insurance - Embrace is great
Embrace is great. The communication, ease of claim submission and turnaround time. The customer service is on point and exceeds expectations. I would recommend and do it all over again.
Embrace Pet Insurance - Embrace insurance is very deceiving on…
Embrace insurance is very deceiving on how they do their claims. They nit pick all the fees picking only the low fees like a cone for an emergency visit but not the actually emergency exam and medicine. I feel this is a rip off for all customers. Also the claims adjusters are not good trying to have customer do their job and me having to spoon feed them on how to communicate and read their own email. Do not recommend this company for anyone.
Embrace Pet Insurance - I just submitted my first claim
I just submitted my first claim. It was very easy but i have not received an approval yet let's see how it goes.
Farmers Insurance - Car totaled July 4th
Alright here we go. So July forth I was going down a back road (rainy) as I cut the corner I see this Tahoe coming at me at a 90 degree angle (she lost control) and just smashes into me. I didn’t have insurance on this car I had it’s one of my cars I don’t drive often, but with all the pictures and you can clearly see it’s her fault farmers insurance is still denying that’s it her fault I’m at total loss of words (no dash cam) I’m not going down without a fight or a payout so I’m consulting a injury lawyer but is this how it really goes? The pictures her car is just layed smashed into my car and they say it wasent her fault?
your insurance company - Other driver in at-fault accident contacting me about coverage for their rental
A couple months ago I rear ended someone. They were waiting to turn right and I was behind them doing the same. They looked like they started turning, so I pulled up to the crosswalk and looked left to check for traffic, then started my own turn when the coast was clear - only to bump into their rear corner and realize they hadn't actually turned when I thought they did; they were still just waiting there in front of the crosswalk. I was at fault for beginning my turn without looking and rear ending them (I know you're advised to not accept fault at the scene of an accident but I'd never been in an accident before and I was pretty flustered). I apologized to the other party and we exchanged insurance and contact information. Neither of us wanted to call the police and they assured me they weren't hurt.
The other driver asked me to call them in about an hour after they got home, but insisted I don't leave a voicemail if they don't pick up. I agreed but the more I thought about it the less sense it made to me if we were just going to go through insurance anyway, but I called regardless and sure enough they didn't pick up. They filed a claim later that day, I was found 100% at fault, and I thought that was it.
Earlier today, however, I received a voicemail from that other driver asking me to call them when I could. I didn't see a reason to if our insurance settled it, but against my better judgment I went ahead and called them back. They told me that my insurance had refused to pay for their rental car, and wouldn't give them a "satisfactory reason" for the denial. They asked me if I could get in touch with my insurance company about it, and while I wasn't really sure what I can do about that, I told them I'd try. They did \*not\* ask me if I would be willing to pay for it myself, and I did not offer to do so, but I kind of got the vibe that they might have wanted me to if my insurance doesn't cover it. They also gave a specific number for the amount of the rental, leading me to believe they'd already rented it and were seeking reimbursement.
So my question is, do I actually bother contacting my insurance company about this? I assume that they had a reason to refuse to cover it; the amount the other driver paid sounded like too much to me, but this is just my speculation. Even if it's just my insurance being stingy, this seems like an issue that the other driver should be settling with them or going through their own insurance for, rather than something they should be contacting me about personally. What could I even do? Calling my insurance company and asking them "hey uhh could you cover the rental for that person I rear ended a couple months ago, they said you won't for some reason" doesn't strike me as a good idea.
My gut instinct is that the other driver is shit out of luck for getting an expensive rental before confirming that it would be covered, and I should refuse further contact, block their number, and let them deal with in
Lemonade Insurance - Lemonade Insurance
Hi All,
I’m here to both give a review and also ask a question. I’ve had lemonade insurance (wellness + accidental coverage) for about a year & 5 months now. At first, I really enjoyed it and didn’t have any issues with them, now I wouldn’t recommend if you have a pet that is known to get into incidents.
I adopted my dog from a previous family who conveniently excluded his PICA issue. He is a 3 year old cavapoo who is notorious for taking anything he can get his hands on (socks, underwear, hygienic products, etc) and swallowing it. He’s had 2 surgeries (1 in March of 2024, and another in June of 2024). His first surgery was pre-policy and he was not insured with Lemonade. His second one I did receive reimbursement. We recently just went through another scare now in July 2025 (we have a behavior consult soon and take serious precautions, he is just VERY VERY sneaky) but thankfully, he was only hospitalized with fluids and passed the clothing in his stool, NO surgery was performed.
Now, Lemonade is denying my claim to cover the costs of hospitalization due to “Foreign material ingestion being determined to be a Recurring Condition, which is not covered under this policy.” I reread my policy, and this is the exact language on it:
“Conditions arising from a repetitive and specific activity that leads to decontamination (i.e., the induction of vomiting, stomach pumping, or treatment with charcoal), medical, or surgical treatment of your pet, if the same or a similar activity occurred two times within 18 months prior to the treatment date.”
I’d like to add the claims specialist also got his medical records incorrect in her summary and argued that the decision was also based on the surgery that happened in March BEFORE my coverage took place. I got her on the phone and corrected her inaccuracies, but she is saying based on the recurrent conditions definition, those 2 incidents (March 2024 and June 2024) fall under the “18 months prior to treatment date.”
From my understanding and the actual explicit language of the policy, how can the March 2024 surgery be considered if it predates coverage and there’s no legal language stating that pre-policy incidents are included?? Am I crazy or should I escalate this with DFS??, I am in NYC.
Any lawyers’ thoughts welcomed!!
Tesla Insurance - [CA] Rear ended, subrogated, repair complete but need to pursue diminished value from at-fault driver's insurance. Adjuster is non-responsive.
A few weeks ago I was rear ended at a complete stop. Had dashcam footage, etc. so all set there. I subrogated through my insurance and got my car fixed, etc. That is done. My adjuster said a diminished value claim would have to be made directly with the other party's insurance, Tesla Insurance in this case, however.
I got the information of the Tesla adjuster - just a name and phone number. He doesn't answer calls and his voicemail is full. He also does not answer texts. I am wondering what next steps could be - I suppose I could file a small claims case for the diminished value to get things moving. It has been a while. I was hit in a brand new, high value sports car with a few hundred miles so I am *very* keen on pursuing diminished value.
Make A Complaint
Loading...