I have a 2015 Toyota RAV4 and I still owe 12,000 on the vehicle, Just got it last year. with that being said I was in an accident on 3/6 and their insurance company wants to claim the vehicle as a total loss... my question is what if they don't give me enough to cover the loan? I am pretty stressed because the accident was not my fault at all. it is going to liberty mutual does anyone have any idea?

Don’t trust this company! We had our mortgage insurance one year from 2170 to the following year 4340! Double! Well our dwelling went from 356,000 to 375,000.

My family has Cigna through my husband’s employer. About two months ago I felt like I had the flu, and couldn’t get in with my PCP until the following week. Was told I should try go to urgent care for a flu test and to get checked out. I did, and was in and out in about 30 minutes (flu A positive, sent on my way with some meds). A few weeks later, I get a bill for almost $400 and was shocked. A month later, my son ended up getting rushed to the ER. We were there for about 7 hours under observation after getting some initial meds…. And I just got the bill for that. $150 copay, that’s it. Looked up our coverage with Cigna. It states ER visits have a $150 copay with the deductible waived. For urgent care, it says “after the in-network deductible is met, you pay 10%”. In what world is this right? I thought the whole point of an urgent care was to try to alleviate the stress on ERs. I feel like now I have no reason to ever go to an urgent care… even if all I need is a simple strep test or have UTI symptoms. Is this becoming the norm?

Location: cook county, Illinois I was recently involved in a car accident. I was stopped at a stop sign, behind the white line and on my side of the road. I was waiting to turn left. Another driver who was driving on the perpendicular road ended up making a left hand turn on the road I was on. She ended up hitting me by driving head on into me. After she hit me I approached her vehicle and in a non aggressive way (however I was irritable) I asked why she hit me/ how she did not see me? She claimed she was distracted by her daughter and simply did not see me and hit me head on. She was very apologetic and admitted fault. I contacted non emergency police to come to the scene so we could exchange info. When police arrived they took our statements and the report states I was at the stop sign and driver admitted not seeing me and hitting me. The report also states I was not obstructing any road ways or her lane of travel. I figured this was pretty clear cut. However I recently found out through my insurance company that the other drivers insurance is now denying taking liability and claiming I am at fault because the driver is now reporting to her insurance company that I was in her lane and not giving her enough room to make the turn. Even though police report states the opposite and she admitted that she hit me to police because she didn’t see me. The police also stated in their report that she was at fault. The husband of the driver who was not present at the scene reached out to me via text the day after the accident to apologize for his wife hitting my car and requesting to fix my car by not going through insurance because he did not want his rates to go up. I did not respond to his text and simply just started the claim through my insurance. I am speculating this angered him and he is now encouraging his wife to change the story to now find me at fault. I obtained a copy of the police report and I am currently waiting on the body cam footage from the police that recorded our statements that night of the accent as proof that the other driver admitted fault to submit to my insurance since the claim is now in the arbitration process. I also sent screenshots of the text message the husband sent me as further proof as an admission of guilt to my insurance. I am curious, I know at this point the insurance companies are dueling this out and will present my proof to a third party and the decisions will eventually be made to determine who is at fault if I am understanding that correctly. But is there anything else that can be done? Can I go after the other driver for providing fraudulent information/ lying to her insurance? Or will that be determined in the arbitration process? Her insurance claimed they did a “careful investigation” and are denying my claim because they find me at fault. However it does not sound like her insurance obtained the police report so I am unclear as to how they performed a “careful investigation”. Lastly, is anyone able to provide any insight into the likelihood of me winning this arbitration case and if there is anything else I can/should do?

Hey! I have a question. I reside in Tallahassee, Florida. I have one car here (2025 Toyota Corolla) and a car in Miami (2005 Toyota Camry). I informed Geico that the Camry is in Miami, and my sister is the primary driver. Geico informed me yesterday that they will drop the car from my insurance because they think that it’s her car (it’s my car in my name). They told me I needed the registration that shows the car is mine, and it needs to show the address where I’m at, which is the mailing address in Tallahassee (I go between Tallahassee and Miami). Anyone has been through this? Please advise.

I have Allstate currently, paying ~$300/month for bare minimum requirements on financed car. Final payment was just drafted, and they sent me renew documents. New monthly premium will be almost $400/month. No accidents, incidents, new drivers, nothing. Everything is exactly the same as when I started the policy. Why would it go up so much? I expected an increase but I feel like this is a lot. I’m a fairly young driver (22) with a newer vehicle, so I know that’s a factor, but I simply can’t afford to pay that much. Is it going up for everyone?

\*EDIT: I've been corrected by a few people-- The person I was interacting with was probably a medical technician/phlebotomist, not a nurse. Sorry for the mix-up in the title. Hi all. I have a problem, and I'm not sure what to do. Earlier this week I (24F) went to a Labcorp office to get blood tests done in advance of my hematology appointment (this is something I have to do multiple times a year). When I got there and was checked in, the medical technician\* asked me if I was there on the orders of "Doctor Smith" (fake name). I told her that while Doctor Smith was one of my doctors, I was actually there at the request of my hematologist, "Doctor Johnson." The Labcorp worker told me that there was nothing from Doctor Johnson's office in the system, and the request from Doctor Smith was the only one she could see, so it HAD to be the right one. Since she was the expert, I assumed she was right and went along with it. Well, that was a bad move. Instead of giving me the tests I needed, the medical technician\* redid ten completely unrelated tests that I had already gotten done in August. Now I found out that they're planning to charge me $220 for the incorrect tests, plus I need to go back and have more blood drawn because I still haven't done any of the tests I need for my hematology appointment. Is there anything I can do to not pay this initial $220 bill? It really feels unfair to me, mostly because I already had to pay an identical bill back in August when I got these tests done the first time. I've already called the Labcorp, my insurance, and the hematologist's office, but all of them seem really unsure about the situation. Which one should I keep calling? For extra context... I live in Maryland and make roughly $65k a year. I'm on my dad's insurance.

Just switched from Embrace Pawprotect to Trupanion... Can't seem to find an app for it in the google play store. What kind of insurance company doesn't have a mobile app in the year 2025? 😭

Here's the situation: **The unit below me reported ongoing water damage on their ceiling/wall.** The building paid a plumber to do an investigation. After many hours, they were able to determine there was water coming from my toilet. I brought in my own plumber and he figured out there was a leak inside the wall where the toilet connects to the pipe (its a wall mount toilet and the gasket wasn't forming a tight seal with the pipe). This toilet pre-dates my ownership, if that matters. I had him fix it and paid him. Obviously the apartment below has repair costs. I immediately engaged a claim with my homeowner policy provider (Travellers), sent them the plumbers reports (both mine and the building), the by-laws of the building, and put my insurance in touch with the owners of the below unit. Fast forward, after some research, **my claim person says 'I'm not liable because there was no way for me to know about the leak, so the owners of the below unit should file with their insurance'** It is true there was no visible leak or damage in my apartment. Now the unit below me sent me an estimate from their contractor and says 'As you’ll see, they have denied the claim, stating there was “no evidence of neglect” on your part. **Given the damages I sustained, I need to understand how you intend to address this situation and take responsibility for the repairs.**' It's not clear if they've filed with their insurance. The husband and wife don't always seem to be on the same page. They are claiming repairs cost $30,000! I don't know how much of this is really related to the damage, as they are also in the midst of a major reno and might be using this to pay for some of that on the sly. I don't have a relationship with them. To clarify the leak was a long slow drip, which only occurred when the toilet flushed, which is why it took so long for the building plumbers to track down. Regardless, it seems weird to me that the insurance judges I'm not liable, just because I couldn't know about the problem. Especially since the policy seems to explicitly cover damage from water seepage where the insured is unaware because its hidden in a wall (in the DOES NOT COVER section for liability it says: CONTINUOUS OR REPEATED SEEPAGE OR LEAKAGE OF WATER OR STEAM OVER A PERIOD OF TIME, WEEKS, MONTHS, OR YEARS, FROM WITHIN A PLUMBING, DRAINAGE, HEATING, AIR CONDITIONING,SYSTEM OR AUTOMATIC FIRE PROTECTIVE SPRINKLER SYSTEM OR FROM WITHIN A HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE **UNLESS SUCH SEEPAGE OR LEAKAGE OF WATER OR STEAM AND THE RESULTING DAMAGE ARE UNKNOWN TO ALL insureds AND ARE HIDDEN WITHIN THE WALLS OR CEILINGS OR BENEATH THE FLOORS OR ABOVE THE CEILINGS OF A STRUCTURE**). **Right now I'm waiting for response from my insurer and also the apartment below** (to see if they have filed with their insurer and if that insurer is in contact with mine). Up until now my interactions on this issue with the apartment below have been pretty even tempered, but their latest email feels like they are escalating and I'm concerned I might even need a lawyer (I live in NYC btw). (added highlights to help with TLDR)

Hello Everyone, My car was hit from side by another person backing out in school parking. He accepted his fault and gave me his insurance and DL. Both of us have GEICO so thought it would be easy claim. When I put the claim, Geico reached out saying he has coverage issues and asked to use my policy for damage repair as No fault even though his policy showed active from 02/01/2025 - 08/01/2025 and my car being hit on 3/28/2025. GEICO mentioned it would be difficult in case person doesn't pay. How do I proceed, and what about the diminished value as GEICO saying if claim is put on my policy, GEICO will not pay Diminished claim. What are my options, can someone please suggest as car is just 1 month old. There is big dent on the passenger side. How can someone insurance shows active from Feburary but they will not pay. Appreciate your advice. Thank you.